Malaysia Needs Broad-based Policy-making to Beat Pandemic and Save Livelihood

15 June, 2021

Malaysia needs broad-based policy-making to beat pandemic and save livelihood

Gabungan Bertindak Malaysia (GBM) calls for the broadening of political base for government policies to be competent, comprehensive and coherent to beat the Covid-19 pandemic and save livelihood of Malaysians. This is best achieved by a “confidence and supply agreement” (CSA) between the government and opposition parties to effect a political ceasefire and restore political stability.

Instead of overcoming the political crisis since February 2020, the Emergency has severely weakened Malaysia’s response to the pandemic in two ways.

First, the questionable majority of the Government preserved by the Emergency has resulted in insular and narrow-based policy-making, marked by blindspots, incoordination and disconnect from the public.

Second, the suspension of parliamentary oversight has worsened the “dua darjat” phenomenon, double-standard in law-enforcement and queue-jumping in vaccination and fueled public discontentment giving rise to suspicion of corruption when the government seems underperforming and incapable to solve many issues of NIP implementation since the programme started more than 3 months ago.

GBM calls upon the Government and Opposition parties to express their willingness to enter a CSA that

• paves way for broadbased policy making and parliamentary oversight through a reopened and empowered parliament with every ministry scrutinized by a parliamentary select committee and every opposition MP and government backbencher sitting on at least one such committee;
• ensures political stability for an extended period before a pre-agreed date for the 15th General Election (GE15) so that all parties and MPs can concentrate on policies instead of electioneering;
• ensures equitable treatment of all MPs in committee appointment and constituency allocation, and from selective prosecution.

GBM finds the idea of unity government both inviable and undesirable. Extensive reshuffling of cabinet and inter-party negotiation for ministerial portfolios will likely cause more inter-party and inter-personal power struggle than reducing it, hence first causing more disunity. And in the unlikely event of success, an all-party unity government also means no opposition and weaker parliamentary oversights.

GBM opposes the idea of a National Operations Council (MAGERAN), which will further narrow instead of broadening the political base of policy-making. An unelected body consisting one or few politicians with the heads of civil service, military and police has no democratic legitimacy. Any misstep by MAGERAN may trigger a colossal public backlash that erodes the legitimacy of the bureaucracy, security forces and even the constitutional monarchy.

Issued by
Badlishah Sham Baharin,
Chair, Gabungan Bertindak Malaysia (GBM)
For and on behalf of the Executive Council, GBM

 

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=3698154916957919&id=163726347067478

Response to Asia Sentinel Article

17 January 2020

I am neither an educationalist nor an academician privy to the on-goings or politics in the Ministry of Education (MOE). Notwithstanding, my training as a clinician allowed me to diagnose a vengeful and dysfunctional personality trait after perusing the style and tone of his writings.
https://www.asiasentinel.com/society/islamic-assault-malaysia-higher-education/

To begin with, the writer, in his tweet dated 5/11/2015 alleged that he was dismissed from Universiti Malaysia Perlis. He also attached a letter from the university authorities dated 8/9/2015, informing him of the non-renewal of his contract service which expired on 4/8/2015. So much for his honesty and integrity in his narrative.

Is it therefore any surprise that a colleague who first shared the asiasentinel article with me was put off after reading the initial few lines?

It would seem that his source, a former vice-chancellor (VC), probably had an axe to grind. His VC source was very likely a political VC appointee of the previous BN minister of education. Back then, meritocracy was virtually an unknown entity, and the VC selection process was based on “who you know” and not on “what you know”

The selection of VCs has changed since the days of the BN rule. After various feedback from academia and a town hall session in mid July 2018, a new selection process and system were introduced.

The MOE’s independent VC Selection Committee made their recommendations based on a set of core criteria namely, academic excellence, meritorious scholarship, visionary and intellectual leadership.

To suggest the selection process was instead hijacked by the candidate’s religiosity and affiliation with the minister, other religious personalities or groupings is damning the impartiality and wisdom of the esteemed members of the VC Selection Committee.

The Malaysian Academic Movement (Gerak) in no uncertain terms debunked similar suggestions made by Sabahan political parties upon the appointment of Prof Taufik Yap Yun Hin’s as Universiti Malaysia Sabah’s (UMS) VC.

In their 11 August 2019 press release they stated; “Gerak knows of the quality and integrity of individuals in the (VC) committee and stands by their decision.”

The allegations of the writer smacks of disinformation and malice, let alone being “Evidence Based Research”

Prof Tan Sri Dr Ghauth Jasmon, the newly appointed chairman of UPM’s Board of Directors, in his immediate response to the malicious article wrote; “But for the writer or anyone to allege that I am a loyalist to the former Education Minister, IKRAM etc shocked me beyond belief. The writer is nothing but the best of a SLANDERER that I have known. I leave the matter to Allah, the Supreme Creator and Supreme Judge.”

Unlike the writer, I took the trouble to do a little bit of homework to track the affiliations of the 26 alleged “members of Ikram that Maszlee appointed to Malaysian public universities.”

According to Ikram sources, only six (23%) of those appointed by Dr. Maszlee are registered as members of Ikram. The rest are probably scratching their heads wondering when they filled the Borang Keahlian Ikram! The accusation that the Minister had been favoring and appointing Ikram members is therefore an outright lie.

Probably the only grain of truth in the writer’s long diatribe against Ikram is his suggestion that the; “Ikram leadership, which also appears to be strongly aligned with the Pakatan Harapan government.”

Since the historical electoral events of May 2018, elements of the “deep state” have been on overdrive to malign and undermine the PH government efforts towards nation re-building.

The education ministry, then under Maszlee Malik was a soft and oft-target of these despicable characters and their accomplices. Besides, the Education Ministry sits on a gold mine, RM64.1 billion to be exact, which under Maszlee’s minister-ship, none of these scumbags and cronies could smell a penny. Virtually all the funds were disbursed towards the transformation of the educational infrastructure including wiring them with fast and reliable ICT infrastructure to enhance digital teaching and learning.

Only after his resignation were his detractors, who were foolishly obsessed with the paradigm of black shoes, Khat and Jawi, became cognizant of the overwhelming success of his on the grounds reforms which had benefitted the school going children, university students, relieved the teachers of irrelevant clerical tasks, pleased the National Union of the Teaching Profession (NUTP) and Parent-Teachers Associations. Most importantly, the core values of happiness, love and mutual respect (which is so much missing among the many supposedly adult Malaysians) were being mainstreamed as a pre-requisite towards rejuvenating a harmonious and muhibbah future Malaysia.

Ikram, then Jamaah Islah Malaysia (JIM) in the 1970s, had invested big time in the educational sector and have built educational institutions from pre-school to university and medical school programs. As suggested by the writer, they were aligned with the PH and therefore were a natural partner of the ex-minister in his mission and vision to reform the nation’s educational landscape.

Like us in the Muslim Professionals Forum (MPF), Ikram was one of the founding members of Gabungan Bertindak Malayisa (GBM) aka Plan Of Action for Malaysia (POAM) which is a closely knitted coalition of over 25 NGOs from various ethnic, cultural and religious backgrounds united and committed to address the critical challenges facing 21st century Malaysia and working together to nurture trust and mutual respect of the other, to harness the potential of the various communities, to inspire a common national goal and to achieve a harmonious co-existence which would enhance national growth and prosperity for all.

Ikram’s Zaid Kamaruddin is currently the chairman of GBM, which truly is a microcosm of Malaysia. And most recently, to defuse the war of words over Jawi, GBM organized the “Forum Jawi: Saling Memahami” which among others was attended by the now Director General of the MOE, who according to the chairperson of the Forum “very kindly came down to speak (at very short notice) at the Jawi Forum we organized, and impressed many with her professionalism”

The writer’s unveiled attempt to frame Ikram as an extremist organization bent on a crusade of Islamisation and proselytisation is yet another machination of the “deep state” through its servile agents to abuse the religious narrative to destabilize the nation.

It wasn’t too difficult to expose and debunk the religious non-sense promulgated by this news portal. They were also reporting on a load of medical non-sense. Our medical colleagues in Prince Court Medical Centre suffered gross injustice with irresponsible journalism from the same news portal.
https://www.asiasentinel.com/society/medical-malpractice-nightmare-malaysia/
I would therefore advise all readers to be wary of news emanating from this particular news portal.

Dato’ Dr Musa Mohd Nordin
musamn@gmail.com
Muslim Professionals Forum

Refugees 1,400 years ago

It was in the early years of Rasulullah’s ﷺ mission. The pagans of Makkah would torture the Muslims every chance they got. It became so bad that Rasulullah ﷺ suggested some of them migrate to Abyssinia or Ethiopia as it is known today. It is not very far from Makkah and its King, known as the Najashi, was just and fair. He was a Christian.

It wasn’t easy. They were leaving behind the only home they knew, their family and friends and all that they held dear. They also did not know how long they would be away for or if they would be back. Najashi welcomed them and finally, they were free from persecution. Free to worship in peace.

But the pagans of Makkah weren’t gonna sit quiet. They had that one trait, we still see today. Dengki! They couldn’t bear the thought of this small group of Muslims living peacefully. They sent 2 reps with specific orders.

“By hook or by crook, get the Najashi to expel them!”

One of the reps was Amr al As (ra) who later became a Muslim himself. He was a good negotiator and knew the Najashi very well. He brought along gifts as bribe (familiar?).

When he saw Najashi he said,

“O King, the people you have given shelter to are troublemakers. Expel them before they bring you problems.”

But the King was fair remember? He said “not without hearing their side.”

The leader of the Muslims was Ja’far ibn Abu Talib (ra). How I love this character. He was Rasulullah’s ﷺ cousin and Ali’s (ra) older brother.

The Najashi then asked Ja’far to explain himself. Now, Ja’far’s reply remains one of the most beautiful descriptions of Islam. You can look it up or message me and I’ll send it to you.

Primarily, Ja’far said, when they became Muslims, the pagans of Makkah began their torture and abuse and prevented them from practicing Islam freely. So they chose the land of the Najashi, as they knew they could live in peace.

What did Najashi then do? He turned to Amr and basically said,

“pack your bags, take your gifts and go back. No way am I expelling these people. They are free to live and worship in my land.”

Amr tried again the following day but failed to convince the Najashi.

The Muslims lived peacefully in Abyssinia for many years. In fact they only joined Rasulullah ﷺ 7 years after he migrated to Madina. This tells us that they were in no danger at all in Najashi land.

Now when we hear this story, we applaud Najashi right? What a man! He saved a group of Muslims. Had he sent them back, their lives would have certainly been in danger.

Fast forward to 2021. Millions of refugees are fleeing for their lives, seeking safety. Some are here on our shores. Do you think it’s easy leaving their homeland? To a place unknown? And worse, hostile.

But they had to make that journey because their homes are no longer safe. They’re here because they need protection and we are in a position to provide that.

And how do we react? Just like Amr and the pagans of Makkah. We want to send them back to their tormentors, to their deaths.

How can we champion the human rights of one group of people and spit on another? If we stand against oppression, it’s gotta be for all oppressed people. If we stand in solidarity with those whose lives are made a living hell, then their skin colour, nationality, ethnicity, religion make no difference.

Where’s our humanity?

Where’s the Najashi in us? Where?

We are so messed up.

Azra Banu
Chairperson
Carefugees

#seerahchronicles
#theseerahandlifetoday

Invitation to the People’s Health Forum Virtual PC on the Petition to Prime Minister, tomorrow 10am

Dear friends,

Thank you for your kind support and endorsement of the petition initiated by the People’s Health Forum addressing to the Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin. Very good responses we have received so far, 81 organisations/groups and 70 individuals have endorsed the statement (please refer to the list below – if found any mistake please inform us).

This is probably a good beginning to show that Malaysian society and people do care and concern about this issue, the government should not continue with the arrest operation of undocumented migrants.

We would like to invite you, as the endorsers, to the press conference (PC) tomorrow morning at 10am. The petition itself will be delivered to the Prime Minister’s Office in the morning before the PC. We will reveal and read out the petition during the PC, then the floor is open to you , whoever is interested to give a short speech.

To facilitate the process, if you would like to attend the PC and/or would like to speak, please indicate your interest with us by replying to this email. The link to the event will be provided later. The live broadcast of this PC will be also carried via the People’s Health Forum Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Peopleshealthforum.msia

Let’s meet tomorrow morning at 10am!

Thank you very much.

Yours truly,
Lim Chee Han
On behalf of the People’s Health Forum
014-9272586

Senarai sokongan / List of endorsement:

Organisasi/ Organisation:
1. People’s Health Forum (Forum Kesihatan Rakyat)
2. Citizens’ Health Initiative
3. Agora Society Malaysia
4. Third World Network
5. Health Equity Initiatives
6. Parti Sosialis Malaysia
7. Aliran
8. All Women’s Action Society (AWAM)
9. Alternatives to Violence Project (AVP Malaysia)
10. ALTSEAN-Burma
11. Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM)
12. Archdiocesan Human Development Commission (AHDC)
13. Asylum Access Malaysia
14. Beyond Borders Malaysia
15. Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ)
16. Citizens Against Enforced Disappearances (CAGED)
17. Consumers Association of Penang (CAP)
18. Demokrat Kebangsaan
19. Dewan Perhimpunan China Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor (KLSCAH)
20. ENGAGE
21. Episcopal Commission for the Pastoral Care of Migrants & Itinerants (ECMI)
22. Family Frontiers
23. Forum Ekonomi Manusiawi
24. Fugee
25. G25 Malaysia
26. Gabungan Serikat Buruh Indonesia (GSBi)
27. GERAK
28. Geutanyoe Foundation
29. Humanity Heroes Foundation
30. IMAN Research
31. In Between Cultura
32. Institute for Leadership and Development Studies
33. International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific
34. Islamic Renaissance Front
35. Jaringan kampung Orang Asli Semenanjung Malaysia
36. Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (JERIT)
37. Koalisi Buruh Migran Berdaulat
38. Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Bina Karya Utama (LBH-BKU)
39. Liga Rakyat Demokratik
40. LLG Cultural Development Centre
41. Mahasiswa Amanah Nasional
42. Mahasiswa Keadilan Malaysia
43. Majlis Kebajikan Kanak-kanak Malaysia (MKKM)
44. Malaysia Hindu Sangam
45. Malaysian CARE
46. Malaysian Health Coalition
47. Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA)
48. Migrant Workers Right to Redress Coalition
49. Muslim Professionals Forum
50. MyPJ
51. New Student Movement Alliance of Malaysia (NESA)
52. North South Initiative
53. Our Journey
54. PACOS Trust
55. Pemuda Sosialis
56. People Like Us Support Ourselves (PLUsos)
57. Persatuan Kebajikan Anak Anak Miskin Sabah
58. Persatuan Kebajikan Biji Sawi (Mustard Seed Soup Kitchen)
59. Persatuan Kebajikan Komuniti Dan Dialog
60. Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor
61. Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia
62. Pertubuhan Jaringan Orang Asli Johor (JPOAJ)
63. PeSAWAH
64. Prison Fellowship Malaysia Sabah
65. Projek Wawasan Rakyat (POWR)
66. Pusat Komas
67. Refuge For The Refugees
68. Sabah Reform Initiative (SARI)
69. Sahabat Alam Malaysia
70. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)
71. Serikat Buruh Migran Indonesia (SBMI) Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT)
72. Sisters in Islam
73. Stairway to Hope
74. Student Progressive Front UUM
75. Student Unity Front UKM
76. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
77. Tenaganita
78. Tindak Malaysia
79. Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of KL (TRCAKL)
80. Together Against Cancer (TAC)
81. UMANY

Individual / Individu:
1. Abu Mufakhir
2. Ahmad Kamal
3. Ananti Rajasingam
4. Andrew Khoo
5. Anthony David
6. Arief Subhan
7. Arutchelvan
8. Bernice Ho
9. Bin Rites
10. Celine Khoo
11. Charles Bertille
12. Cikgu Mohd Azmi b Abdul Hamid
13. CR Selva
14. Dato’ Dr Amar-Singh HSS
15. Dato M. Ramachelvam
16. Dato Noor Aziah Mohd Awal
17. Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan
18. Datuk Dr Anwar Fazal
19. Datuk Dr Toh Kin Woon
20. Dr Ayesah Uy Abubakar
21. Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj
22. Dr Lee Boon Chye
23. Dr Ryan Chua
24. Elain Lockman
25. Elaine Lau
26. Faisal Tehrani
27. Hamidon Ali
28. Hana Maisurah
29. Hartini Zainudin
30. Heidy Quah Gaik Li
31. Hew Kuen Hin
32. Jarud Romadan
33. Jeremy Kwan
34. K. Jeyaraj
35. Kelvin Soimin
36. Lilian Si
37. Lim Siew Kiau
38. Linda Lumayag
39. Loh Jon Ming
40. LY Phang
41. Lynn Tung
42. M.Pusenthi P.Maniam
43. Mahirah Hanis
44. Mary Shanthi Dairiam
45. Mohd Nadzir bin Mohd Nordin
46. Muhammad Sha’ani bin Abdullah
47. Mui Mei Moon
48. Nazihah Muhamad Noor
49. Ng Peng Wah
50. Nik Elin Zurina Bt Nik Abdul Rashid
51. Ooi Vern Hau
52. Peter Pang
53. Prof Shad Saleem Faruki
54. Pua Lay Peng
55. Ronnie Hii
56. Saha Deva A. Arunasalam
57. Salina Hussein
58. Sangeeta choudhury
59. Sivarajan A
60. Sunita Rajakumar
61. Surina Shukri
62. Teng Pooi Kui
63. Teoh Siang Chin
64. Thamboo Devaraj
65. Veronica Anne Retnam
66. Victoria Ng Yiow Kheng
67. Vizla Kumaresan
68. Yap Heng Lung
69. Zahid Alom
70. Zhen Ling Ong